• Users Online: 126
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents  
CASE REPORT
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 10  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 145-147

Transverse terminal upper limb deficiency through the arm: The problem and management


Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India

Date of Web Publication22-Nov-2018

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Alok Chandra Agrawal
Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur - 492 099, Chhattisgarh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jotr.jotr_39_18

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Transverse terminal deficiencies of the arm differ from transhumerus amputations. Whereas transverse limb deficiency is due to congenital causes transhumerus amputation are usually acquired. The paper deals with a congenital transverse limb deficiency at the mid-arm level which presented to us with pain in the amputation stump with a projection of bone through the skin.

Keywords: Congenital upper limb deficiency, transhumeral amputation, unilateral affection


How to cite this article:
Agrawal AC, Sakale H, Kumar S. Transverse terminal upper limb deficiency through the arm: The problem and management. J Orthop Traumatol Rehabil 2018;10:145-7

How to cite this URL:
Agrawal AC, Sakale H, Kumar S. Transverse terminal upper limb deficiency through the arm: The problem and management. J Orthop Traumatol Rehabil [serial online] 2018 [cited 2018 Dec 19];10:145-7. Available from: http://www.jotr.in/text.asp?2018/10/2/145/245995




  Introduction Top


Congenital limb deficiencies are reported in every 6/10,000 live births per year in the USA. As per the centers for disease control and prevention estimate, 2250 babies are born every year in the USA with a congenital limb deficiency of the upper or lower limb. The upper limb gets involved two times more as compared to the lower limb.[1] Recent data suggest a relationship between paternal occupation and increased prevalence of birth defects, including limb deficiencies, in offspring of artists.[2] The known causes for congenital disorders include medications such as thalidomide, retinoic acid, and misoprostol, vascular disruption (e.g., amniotic band syndrome), vascular malformations (e.g., Poland syndrome), or genetic factors (spontaneous point mutation).[3] Animal experimental studies suggest that limb deficiency in amniotic band syndrome may be due to hypoxia followed by cell damage, hemorrhage, tissue loss, and reperfusion.[4] In most cases, the cause may not be known.[5] Transhumerus amputation (acquired amputations) in contrast occurs following trauma or disease (i.e., neoplasm or infection.) It is difficult to detect these deficiencies before birth In spite of prenatal screening ultrasound scans.[6]

In a child with a congenital transhumeral deficiency, an active elbow joint does not exist; hence, the child lacks the ability to grasp objects in the cubital fold. As the deficiency becomes increasingly proximal, as with shoulder disarticulations, it becomes increasingly difficult to perform functional activities. If the child has bilateral upper limb deficiencies at the more proximal levels, the child can work with occupational therapists to perform activities of daily living with their feet.[7] Most of the attention in these children is paid to the social management, but they may have local problems too at the amputation site including pain, neuropathy, bony spike, and bone overgrowth, trophic changes in the skin, muscle wasting, and ill-fitting prosthesis. We are reporting a case of a 7-year-old girl who presented to us at the age of 7 years with local bony overgrowth but did not want any surgery.


  Case Report Top


A 7-year-old female child presented to us with left-sided transhumeral congenital amputation. There was no history of trauma or any other associated congenital anomalies. The child was not using any orthotics, could do all her work by the right upper limb and was not trained to use the lower limbs instead of upper limbs. There was no history of similar problem in other members of the family. The mother did not give history of using any medication, radiation, viral infection, or trauma during pregnancy. The girl had a mobile atrophic upper limb with a long stump covered by thin skin devoid of any muscle and the tip had the bone of chitinous material like a horn or nail [Figure 1] and [Figure 2].
Figure 1: Front view of the child showing left mid arm amputation with bony horn

Click here to view
Figure 2: The child from behind showing the congenitally amputated left arm with bony horn

Click here to view


An X-ray taken of the amputated limb showed terminal bony overgrowth for several centimeters ending in a long spike devoid of any soft tissue cover [Figure 3]. The bony overgrowth was difficult to distinguish from parent bone and was also suggestive to be as a result of bony growth due to the growing proximal epiphysis of the humerus at shoulder joint. The patient's parents were advised a revision of congenitally amputated humerus stump with a bone graft at the tip to avoid further growth, but they denied any surgical procedure and were then only counseled for occupational therapy.
Figure 3: X-ray of the amputated limb showing terminal bony overgrowth for several centimeters ending in a long spike devoid of any soft tissue cover

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


Terminal bony overgrowth can occur in children with acquired amputations through a bone and in congenital limb deficiencies. The terminal overgrowth results from the development of appositional new bone on the end of the residual limb.[8] Terminal overgrowth of bone causes pain, bursitis, and if left untreated, can penetrate the skin.

Postamputation other complications include:[9] Pain from overuse syndromes from compensatory techniques, low back pain from altered gait, neuroma, Joint contractures, heterotopic ossification, dermatologic and skin concerns, including wound dehiscence, skin breakdown/ulcers, verruca's hyperplasia, dermatitis, folliculitis, and hyperhidrosis, Psychologically grieving limb loss, depression, body-image concerns, posttraumatic stress disorder, and poor fit with prosthesis.

A multidisciplinary/interdisciplinary approach is recommended when available, with biannually coordinated assessments by the physician, physical therapist, occupational therapist, prosthetics, social worker, psychologist, and nurse to do holistic management of children with congenital disorders.[10] In addition to managing the medical complications, the physiatrist can assist with the patient's life care plan to include potential changes in function/functional goals, medical concerns that may be encountered as the patient ages, planning for a prosthesis, adaptive equipment, therapies, psychological needs, and peer support.[11]

The physical therapist can assist with contracture prevention; core strengthening, balance, gait, endurance, and work on a home exercise program. The occupational therapist can evaluate activities of daily living and assist with adaptive-fitting, and in the case of concomitant upper limb involvement, the patient may need to learn how to use his or her feet for activities and will need to remove the prosthesis for foot use. The prosthetics inspects the integrity of the prosthesis and makes adjustments for growth as necessary to ensure adequate fit in collaboration with the physician. A social worker and psychologist are often needed to assess the patient and family for psychosocial risk factors, depression, problems with self-image/self-esteem, acceptance of disability, and bullying or other school issues. Multidisciplinary management best ensures holistic care of a developing, growing child with a limb difference or acquired amputation. In the community-based practice in which a multidisciplinary approach is unavailable, physician follow-up should be coordinated with the prosthetics whenever possible. Fitting prosthesis should be considered along with the age and developmental milestones of the child with a congenital limb difference.


  Conclusion Top


A 7-year female child with a congenital transverse, terminal amputation of the left arm needs a holistic care. Bony outgrowth needs surgical rehabilitation followed by proper orthotic training which lacks in multiple setups in India. Poverty is a major setback which prevents these patients getting ideal aids, and holistic treatment and efforts should be done to provide basic physical medicine and rehabilitation (PMR) set-ups at all levels so that proper counseling may be done for better management.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/birthdefects/ul-limbreductiondefects.html#ref. [Last accessed on 2014 May 22].  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Desrosiers TA, Herring AH, Shapira SK, Hooiveld M, Luben TJ, Herdt-Losavio ML, et al. Paternal occupation and birth defects: Findings from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study. Occup Environ Med 2012;69:534-42.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Werler MM, Pober BR, Nelson K, Holmes LB. Reporting accuracy among mothers of malformed and nonmalformed infants. Am J Epidemiol 1989;129:415-21.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
McGuirk CK, Westgate MN, Holmes LB. Limb deficiencies in newborn infants. Pediatrics 2001;108:E64.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Yoon PW, Rasmussen SA, Lynberg MC, Moore CA, Anderka M, Carmichael SL, et al. The national birth defects prevention study. Public Health Rep 2001;116 Suppl 1:32-40.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Hostetler SG, Schwartz L, Shields BJ, Xiang H, Smith GA. Characteristics of pediatric traumatic amputations treated in hospital emergency departments: United States, 1990-2002. Pediatrics 2005;116:e667-74.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Alexander MA, Matthews DJ. Pediatric Rehabilitation: Principles and Practice. 4th ed. Demos Medical Publishing: New York; 2010. p. 335-60.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Smith DG, Michael JW, Bowker JH. Atlas of Amputations and Limb Deficiencies: Surgical, Prosthetic, and Rehabilitation Principles. 3rd ed. Rosemont (IL): American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons; 2004. p. 773-914.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Yoo S. Complications following an amputation. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2014;25:169-78.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Le JT, Scott-Wyard PR. Pediatric limb differences and amputations. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2015;26:95-108.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Meier RH 3rd, Choppa AJ, Johnson CB. The person with amputation and their life care plan. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2013;24:467-89.  Back to cited text no. 11
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Case Report
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed15    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded10    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal